Selective Amnesia There was a point to this. But I forgot.

30Apr/0714

Keeping the social fabric of India intact

When I wrote the previous post about the Bollywood royal couple, I was only being snarky. But the more I thought about it, the better the idea seemed to me. In-fact, it seemed like a brilliant way to both earn money and keep the social institution of marriage alive and kicking.

I am talking of a Futures market in marriages. Or, betting on how long a couple will be that.

Here’s how it would work – let’s say a couple – Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai – are so in love with each other, are extremely devoted to each other that they will bet a whole load of things in favour of them being a couple for a long time. Now, my statistics tell me that the current time frame for a couple in the same demographic to be together is 6 years. So, I will take up their bet – Mr. Bachchan’s – at an odds of 10 to 1. That is, if the two stay together for more than 6 years, I will pay them 10 times the money they bet me. If they don’t, I get to pocket the entire amount.

This gives the two of them more than just an emotional and sexual incentive to stay together. Money speaks, AB baby. The money they bet me, I will put in a few equity schemes, on the market or a PPF - judiciously – so I earn something from this risky venture of mine. If the two strike it out together, I also need to pay them back 10 times, which only comes from the market.

Now of course, there’re a lot more couples than just AB and AR, and I am sure, they’d bet enough money for me to make a serious go at keeping it for myself.

The way I look at it – I make money, while keeping the social fabric of India intact*

So, all this was just an idea. I asked my Impractical Libertarian cartel friend of mine and big IIMB grad Mr. K.R Aadishtan, if it’d work. Here’s the chat transcript.

me: Saar….
Aadisht: Yo
me: if you are not too bijy, one sumall kostin
Aadisht: Putits
me: Would there be a market for a marriage betting service? A wedding futures
....
Because, I think this would really work – especially for the yuppies
Say – 20 years, 20 lakhs – at 10 to 1 odds.
Aadisht: Are your contracts going to be on specific pairings or futures?

*or simply timelines?
me: a couple would bet with me
on a certain timeline
I will of course average it out with stats on divorce rates for the demographic and all
Take ABAR fr’nstance
If AB bet me 20 lakhs on a 20 year marriage, at a 10 to 1 odds, they have both a monetary and emotional incentive to stay together
And I could invest that 20 in a way that would still earn me a profit, and pay for the bonus just in case they strike it out for 20 years
Of course, ABAR would be a big bet. I am sure there’d be other couples, not so high profile, who’d still bet a decent sum
Aadisht: Hmm. Strong.
me: Does this work out, in basic terms or is there a serious hole in my logic?
Aadisht: It works very well, because young happily married couples will be overoptimstic and cynicism free
And will bet in the face of the odds
me: I could even propose this as an essential part of every young couple’s pre-nupts
Or, take the idea to a Shaadi.com# or a Bharat Matrimony
Aadisht: Actually.
Fabulous.
This is a new business model.
me: There you go
My revenue model is in place, my market is at-least a billion strong
Aadisht: The couple demands that shaadi.com puts its money on the line and bets that the marriage will last.
me: Woaho! That would work even better.
Shaadi will have an incentive then to better their model, and their service
YAY!
Aadisht: All matchmakers
me: yup. play catchup
Aadisht: including traditional maamis
me: Yes.

So, there you have it. A whole new business plan. Call the VCs. Call the couples. Let a thousand pairings begin today!


Flippant post aside, I think this would work very well.

*Yes, that’s a little Aym Gramd, but I am a bit of an optimist that way

  1. Shaadi.com idea inputted by Chillpilgrim.

| | | |

30Apr/074

The Bollywood royal couple

How much time do you give them to split? Now accepting bets.

Odds:
2 years: 4 to 1
1 year: 2 to 1
6 months: 1 to 1

| | | |

29Apr/072

Relapsed

It’s very humbling, having to eat your own words, but that’s what I must to do now. I am sorry to say that things at BSNL have gone downhill since I last wrote about them. The latest commercials are as bad as they were, even worse. And Preity Zinta’s presence does nothing to it. Actually, she makes it even worse.

Things are back to ‘connecting’, ‘people’, ‘relationships’ and lousy production values.

| | | |

27Apr/071

Poor, little, little-understood font

Comic Sans


  • It’s not that ugly a font, ok! It’s only the most used font. And that is not a problem with its design. I’d wager it’s the opposite, actually

  • I agree, though, that it is not the most graceful one around. But that’s no reason to ban a font.

  • I find it ironic that the site that exists solely to take the font out of circulation use it in its design, and in its merchandise.

  • Which, to my screwed up, conspiracy-theory loving brain suggests that the site is a guerrilla advertising/marketing tactic by the makers of the font – Microsoft. Much like this one for MSN8

  • Just as an afterthought – the story of Comic Sans, from the MS Typography website. (Warning: In orange, and in Comic Sans. I might just about take back the first two points!)

  • P.S. Goundamani and Senthil will have to wait a day more. Comedy, as the cliche goes, is no easy joke.

    | | | | |

    26Apr/073

    1409 people read Selective Amnesia!

    I did say I will write about Goundamani and Senthil next, but this just came in. Fucking unbelievable. SelAm has 1409 subscribers? Fuck! Unbelievable.

    Feedburner-stats All right, even assuming that only 10% of Rojo’s hits are genuine subscriptions, that’s a lot of subscribers (214) for this measly little blog. This changes a lot of things. A lot!

    Perhaps, world domination is not far off.

    Filed under: This Blog 3 Comments
    26Apr/071

    My next post…

    ...will be on Goundamani, Senthil and their genius at comedy.
    Meanwhile, I sincerely request you to read this post.

    | | |

    Filed under: This Blog 1 Comment
    25Apr/071

    The first gallery

    Dearest readers,

    As you all know, I am a photography nut. I delude myself into thinking my photos are art. I am now going to try the same on you. I am going to sell you, not only my idea of my photography, but my photography itself. The kind folks at ImageKind (see, I pun well.) have created a service that lets photography amateurs and experts to frame, mat and sell their wares online. I have pledged my troth with them. Check out my gallery (so imaginatively named The First Gallery) and buy my stuff. Prints start at $9. That’s about 10 dollars too cheap for the kind of photographs I take, but I will gladly bear the difference.

    Thank you.

    C

    Filed under: Photos 1 Comment

    Switch to our mobile site