Set Max vs. Neo Sports « Selective Amnesia

15Mar/075

Set Max vs. Neo Sports

Is it just me, or do you all think, especially after the nasal Neo Sports, and the atrocious DD, Set Max’s coverage of the world cup is actually decent? The commentators, especially.

Posted by Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan

Filed under: General/Unclassified Leave a comment

Comments (5) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post )

Sleepyface
March 15th, 2007 - 19:16

You don’t mean they are indecent, do you? I mean, even the noodle straps have gone?

boy! let me turn on the tele. and btw, thanks for this piece of info.

( REPLY )
Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan
March 15th, 2007 - 21:47

I only meant the coverage, Vishnu. Not the cleavage

( REPLY )
venugopal
March 17th, 2007 - 17:13

i dont know why we are being forced to watch a blabbering baby and a sickening script reader in the name of cricket. i wish….i wasn’t so obsessive about cricket. morever, why should a non-sport channel get the right to telecast an important tourney like WC. Are there any dearth of Sports channels in india? This should also come under the purview of the ICC rules.

( REPLY )
science haunter
March 17th, 2007 - 23:49

not getting what for it?

( REPLY )
Aditya
March 23rd, 2007 - 22:31

I guess you are crazy. Have you and SET MAX forgot that in cricket, an over is of 6 balls. They are so hell bent on showing ads that they dont even wait for the commentators to finish. It sucks …

( REPLY )

About

Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan is a copywriter, photographer and goofball from Chennai. He is also an archaeologist, historian and a city lover. He is currently a documentary film-maker and desk-monkey for a film production house.