Set Max vs. Neo Sports
Is it just me, or do you all think, especially after the nasal Neo Sports, and the atrocious DD, Set Max’s coverage of the world cup is actually decent? The commentators, especially.
| 
cricket | 
World cup | 
cricket world cup | 
media coverage | 
channel wars |
RSS/XML
March 15th, 2007 at 7:16 pm
You don’t mean they are indecent, do you? I mean, even the noodle straps have gone?
boy! let me turn on the tele. and btw, thanks for this piece of info.
March 15th, 2007 at 9:47 pm
I only meant the coverage, Vishnu. Not the cleavage
March 17th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
i dont know why we are being forced to watch a blabbering baby and a sickening script reader in the name of cricket. i wish….i wasn’t so obsessive about cricket. morever, why should a non-sport channel get the right to telecast an important tourney like WC. Are there any dearth of Sports channels in india? This should also come under the purview of the ICC rules.
March 17th, 2007 at 11:49 pm
not getting what for it?
March 23rd, 2007 at 10:31 pm
I guess you are crazy. Have you and SET MAX forgot that in cricket, an over is of 6 balls. They are so hell bent on showing ads that they dont even wait for the commentators to finish. It sucks …