To the good folks at INI Signal

Firstly, neat name for a blog.
Secondly. You, rather, one of you writes this post, that, even to me, sounds like a rant unsure of itself. I mean, legislation for how coalition parties behave? Come on!
Thirdly, when I comment, I do so because I think what I have to say is either relevant or funny, or both. And, I do this despite having realised that blog-debates are at best futile, and the time spent doing that is time not spent trying to get women to dig me. And therefore, when I have analysed all of these, and choose to leave a comment, I’d hate to see it being classified spam. Especially when two of my comments are already published on the post in question. Even-more-especially-when, the comment that was sacrificed was rather tame, and partly funny and wholly self-effacing.

Posted by Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan on March 14th, 2007 | Filed in Blog World |


2 Responses to “To the good folks at INI Signal”

  1. Gaurav Says:

    Regret for spamhood, apparently spam gods love cartel members :-)

  2. madhu Says:

    Very sorry abt that. unfortunately spam filters do strange stuff that us ordinary mortals cannot understand ;).

    One of the reasons this might have happened is perhaps there were more than 2 links in a comment or some one else somewhere for some reason at some time had reported one of ur comments as spam. Spam filters actually take regular updates from an centralised server maintained by their makers as far as i know.

Leave a Comment